The Supreme Court clarified that judicial intervention in arbitral awards is limited to correcting clerical errors, miscalculations, or post-award interest adjustments, reinforcing arbitration's finality while allowing minimal oversight. This ruling slightly broadens court review but keeps arbitration intact, introducing some uncertainty for parties involved. Stakeholders may need to reconsider dispute strategies to navigate potential court involvement, affecting ongoing and future arbitration cases, including significant ones. This decision underscores a balance between preserving arbitration efficiency and ensuring fairness through restricted judicial checks.